Walther Forums banner
21 - 40 of 220 Posts
That's disappointing. I was hoping it would be available sooner. I'm probably not the only disappointed one.
You're not. Many like HKs second to Walther, and at least for me Sigs are beneath HK on the totem pole. LEM is hard to beat in a hammer configuration. Seems by the time they release it, someone will have leapfrogged the stack and a half design. May end up discontinued quickly
 
Never heard of Kusiak. Looks like a great option. My carry guns are pretty well scratched up from carrying in kydex and most leather options just don’t seem to have good retention or trigger guards. I’ll likey try one of these out next time I order one
Kusiak is OUTSTANDING quality but she’s a small operation and you’re going to wait about four months. Get a cheap alternative while you wait for the holster to show up. Order with the “reinforced” leather. Amazing quality.
 
"Micro Compacts" aren't really defined by their capacity - they're simply defined by size, being smaller than a "sub-compact." The Glock 43, for example, is generally considered a "micro," as is the Shield. Neither offer any more capacity than the PPS does.

But it is definitely true that the "micro compact" category has been greatly improved by recent innovations in magazine capacity. IMO, the P365 is still at the top of the heap. But I trust Walther could come up with something even better.
I don't want to split hairs here (although it's too late, I think we're already at that point, LOL)

but... I respectfully disagree.

I believe the micro compact moniker is defined by the 1.5 stack design and the improved capacity it brings to very compact pistols. I've always made a distinction between "sub-compact" double-stacks like the G26/P99c/P224 and the "compact-single stack" carry guns like the G43/PPS/Shield by their magazine design. I had also never referred to the single stack guns as "micro-compacts*".

I'll admit the language around these guns is all very mushy so I don't like to get too hung up on it, but I'll appeal to authority and cite some gun reviews to back up my viewpoint.

The word "micro" doesn't even appear in any of these reviews from prominent publications for the PPSm2 whereas the SIG P365 gets micro right in the review title from those same publications.



Gun Review: SIG SAUER P365 Micro-Compact 9mm Pistol
 
I read something that made sense to me in regards to this segment. The man was comparing various micro pistols and his rough criteria for consideration was.....
1. At least 10 round capacity
2. No more than 6 in. long
3. No more than 4 1/2 inches in height
4. No more than 1 in. thick.
I love my PPS M2, but with the 7 rd. mag (my favorite) it's too tall (4.9 in.) for the "micro" category. And barely qualifies with the six rounder. They say it shoots like a bigger gun. Well.....
It is!
 
I love my PPS M2, but with the 7 rd. mag (my favorite) it's too tall (4.9 in.) for the "micro" category. And barely qualifies with the six rounder.
I also prefer the 7 round magazine, but it makes it just barely too big for IDPA's BUG division. If I run it with 6 round mags, then it will barely fit the BUG dimensions, but then I'm at a disadvantage against other BUG shooters with their tiny pistols that can still get that pinky on the frame. It's a shame that it's a nice little gun, but too big for the IDPA category that it should naturally fit in.
 
I also prefer the 7 round magazine, but it makes it just barely too big for IDPA's BUG division. If I run it with 6 round mags, then it will barely fit the BUG dimensions, but then I'm at a disadvantage against other BUG shooters with their tiny pistols that can still get that pinky on the frame. It's a shame that it's a nice little gun, but too big for the IDPA category that it should naturally fit in.
Thanks for that great feedback. I actually purchased an 8 round mag to try a "big gun" grip without having to buy a bigger gun. And also to have enough mags and capacity to shoot an IDPA. While technically it fits my pinky better, I still prefer the 7 rounder. The 8 just feels a little bulky for carry. But if I had known the PPS M2 didn't fit in IDPA's boxes, I would've invested in another 7. Mags don't last forever anyway, and the 7 gives it perfect symmetrics, to boot.
Oh well, looks like I'll need another gun if I want to participate in IDPA. But on the bright side, it's nice having a good reason to be redundant. Not that gun enthusiasts really need one. LOL
 
I wish everybody would stop kind of whining. Most of millenia has managed to get by without having a micro compact anything. Let alone 18 shots worth. Now it seems no one is worthy of going into the OK Corral without a RPG.
Valid. But I think a big concern is that the pistol and shooting associations ban lower capacity pistols from competing. Whether people want to or care about having high capacity, the goal posts move without you. It makes sense to compete with the gun you carry instead of some 4lb monstrosity with a 2 oz trigger and a C More rifle dot on it
 
I hope they really look at all the choices and come up with something great. Two things I would love to see. The first is a grip a tad bigger in girth to enhance shootability, and control. The P365 is too small and the little bit of girth added on their macro frame is just fat enough without being too fat. Secondly, is a trigger system for concealed carry. I think an AS system like that on my M3 is ideal, though that one specifically is a bit too heavy in compliance with European LEO standards for pull weight.
 
I had no idea Walther was thinking of another mini-9. I had the PPS and then PPS M2 but nowadays carry the Shield Plus when I want a mini. Shield Plus with the shortest mag barely fits in the IDPA box for Back Up Gun category, so I hope that Walther (and HK, if they ever actually release the SFP CC) think about that.
 
Your striker spring is probably dragging on the channel. The spring is excessively long and gets balled up when it gets compressed. You can try cleaning it out, reinstalling the spring, polishing the spring a little, some would advise against lube but you can try. There's a handful of things you can do to smooth out the pull. I put a Glock spring in mine and it made it super light and smooth but I ordered a stock striker assembly for carry. Turns out the one I ordered was very smooth so I haven't reinstalled the Glock modified one even for plinking around with
I put another two hundred rounds through it and, remarkably, it shoots a lot better. It is now shooting as nice as the P365. Maybe I just willed it to shoot better! I still don’t understand how Walther didn’t design a stack and half magazine . The big difference between the PPS and P365 is the mag well. The 365 uses every millimeter of space. The PPS has plenty of extra space in the well. What happened to that great German engineering? Imagine Walther designs a 10+ magazine that would fit the PPS M2! They don’t have to design a whole new gun, just the mag.
 
I read something that made sense to me in regards to this segment. The man was comparing various micro pistols and his rough criteria for consideration was.....
1. At least 10 round capacity
2. No more than 6 in. long
3. No more than 4 1/2 inches in height
4. No more than 1 in. thick.
I love my PPS M2, but with the 7 rd. mag (my favorite) it's too tall (4.9 in.) for the "micro" category. And barely qualifies with the six rounder. They say it shoots like a bigger gun. Well.....
It is!
Sounds like the Ruger Max9 fits the bill to a tee.
 
I think @Mattyd380 might have an interesting update for us....? 🤔
Ha. Thanks for the plug :cool:


It's nothing that hasn't come up here before... but I figured I'd just consolidate all of the "speculative recon" into a video. And it's getting a __it ton of views, so far. Which is cool.

Again, it's mainly speculative. But the schematics are pretty cool to look at, if you haven't had a chance to nerd out on Walther patents yet.
 
21 - 40 of 220 Posts