Right now my PDP-f is my EDC but I'd buy a micro-9 from Walther in a heartbeat. Seems like it's a really popular type of pistol lately.
Agreed. OP: Despite the capacity, the PPS M2 is incredible. Shoot any micro 9 next to one and you'll find yourself coming back to the PPS over and overWalther already makes a Micro 9 - the PPS M2.
Hopefully we'll see an M3 with expanded capacity at some point...
yeah, this is what I'm referring to. A really small 9mm with atleast 10+1 (PDP aesthetic would be great!)PPS is a good gun but it's capacity is pretty dang low for it's size and weight when cross shopped against the latest competition.
It's not a "micro-compact" which in my mind refers to the new hi-cap "stack and a half" guns like the P365, Hellcat, Shield+ etc
6+1 vs 10+1, 12+1, 15+1, 18+1....
If capacity is important to you, you're giving up a lot of firepower with the Walther.
I also prefer the 7 round magazine, but it makes it just barely too big for IDPA's BUG division. If I run it with 6 round mags, then it will barely fit the BUG dimensions, but then I'm at a disadvantage against other BUG shooters with their tiny pistols that can still get that pinky on the frame. It's a shame that it's a nice little gun, but too big for the IDPA category that it should naturally fit in.I love my PPS M2, but with the 7 rd. mag (my favorite) it's too tall (4.9 in.) for the "micro" category. And barely qualifies with the six rounder.
Yeah, it’s definitely not a “me too” based on this.If the gun as shown in the schematic comes to fruition, it will certainly be mechanically unique.
I'm not aware of another centerfire pistol using a center rail like that.
The dual feedramp is pretty rare as well.
I'm assuming this is being done to maximize capacity for the size????
If this is what Walther is working on, it's definitely not a "me too" design.