Walther Forums banner

DPM in Q5

2980 Views 10 Replies 8 Participants Last post by  Marco_it
I have used the DPM recoil reduction system in other make guns with good results. Thinking of getting one for my Q5 Match. Does anyone have experience with this?
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
DPM is certainly a good system and you will be happy with it. However I will suggest you look into SprinCo recoil systems. Alan makes a really great system that he has fine tuned for the Qs and if you need individual attention he will be happy to assist you...

Sprinco USA -- Recoil Reducers

I've used DPM but switched to SprinCo a few years ago and my EDC weapons all have Alan's systems.

Welcome to the Forums BTW...enjoy your time here.
I've tried both and neither offered an appreciable reduction in recoil. I have found using a non-fixed stainless steel guide rod and tuning the pistol to the load through varying spring rates to be much more effective for a competition gun. For a defensive weapon I personally prefer to use factory spring rates to ensure reliable feeding.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
I have the Sprinco and it it shoots a lot softer.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I've tried both and neither offered an appreciable reduction in recoil.
I have been EDCing a Q since 2011 both personally and professionally. Because of an injury I must manipulate and fire my weapon one handed.

Due to one handed shooting I am a bit more sensitive to getting back on target quickly and having tight accurate groups. After careful consideration and testing I found Alan's SprinCo system to offer the very best results.

I have yet to have a failure with the exception of those deliberately manufactured for the purpose of proficiency training. In fact I trust my life and that of my family and comrades to SprinCos every time I carry my Qs or P99.
The only exception is carrying my Q45 because Alan hasn't quite fine tuned the RSA for that model yet.
I've tried both and neither offered an appreciable reduction in recoil. I have found using a non-fixed stainless steel guide rod and tuning the pistol to the load through varying spring rates to be much more effective for a competition gun. For a defensive weapon I personally prefer to use factory spring rates to ensure reliable feeding.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
I have tested both as well. With the Sprinco system (yellow spring), my Q5 "settles more quietly" in a split second, as compared to with a one piece rod and 13lb spring, if that makes sense. With the latter, my red dot moves and settles more violently (kind of wobbly for a lack of better term). I guess that it is because the slide hits the frame harder at the rear end??

I have decided to stick around with the Sprinco because of this difference. Recoil is still there while its impulse is softer.

For self defense, I would stick with the factory spring (my policy = no mod to SD guns).
Sprinco for gun games and factory for self defense here also.
Ciao ragazzi, ma quante libbre è la molla originale?
The original 'red' spring RSA in the Q5 was 48 Newton (10.79 lb). The silver spring is 50 N (11.24 lb).
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top