The P22 has an almost M1911 straight back trigger bar that engages the sear. So the pressure from the trigger/trigger bar is straight back. No offset outside of the frame trigger bar. My sear undercutting and reworked engagement angle, lowered hammer hook and undercut sear has absolutely no creep. I wouldn't say it has any roll either. The hammer is simply released with 2.25'b of pull. Some of these target pistols have some intricate adjustments, geometry and every advantage the engineers can think of. The trigger assembly probably costs more than a new P22.
Got any technical design concepts or other details for these triggers. One of the latests for M1911s is a tru radius sear cut. The sear and hammer hook is straight forward on a P22......what can be done and will it be safe is another issue. The QD pistol has had the hammer hook lowered to about as low as it can go. 1/2 the height of the originals. I think this was necessary in order for the decocking lever to work. Just my guess...but lowering the hook makes for a better trigger. It still seems to be a pretty positive engagement though.
More specs on the technical layout of the rolling trigger please. I'm going hiking this morning. 1917
Got any technical design concepts or other details for these triggers. One of the latests for M1911s is a tru radius sear cut. The sear and hammer hook is straight forward on a P22......what can be done and will it be safe is another issue. The QD pistol has had the hammer hook lowered to about as low as it can go. 1/2 the height of the originals. I think this was necessary in order for the decocking lever to work. Just my guess...but lowering the hook makes for a better trigger. It still seems to be a pretty positive engagement though.
More specs on the technical layout of the rolling trigger please. I'm going hiking this morning. 1917