![]() |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 154
|
PPS vs PPQ for CC
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 119
|
I carry my PPS 9mm everyday in a High Noon "Closing Argument" holster at the 4:00 position. Easy to conceal and light weight. The recoil is minimal for a sub compact gun and my pistol is 100% reliable. Won't carry it if it wasn't 100% reliable.
__________________
PPS/9mm Glock 26 Gen4 SR22 Be safe and always plan for that gun in the back of your head when walking out of the store. Be safe. Be prepared. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 503
|
reliability issues....? I guess you are equating more recoil to more wear on the firearm, thus more potential for failure. I disagree, you can't inversely correlate recoil with reliability, the PPS is engineered to handle the recoil just fine. Much better in fact, then the people that complain about it, lol.
Let's do a tail of the tape: PPQ Dimensions (L/H/W mm)------180/135/34 PPS Dimensions (L/H/W mm)------161/112/23 Difference----------------------------------- ------------------------------------19/23/11 OR in inches ----------------------------------.75/.90/.43 PPQ Weight (grams/ounces)----------695/24.5 PPS Weight (grams/ounces)----------605/21.3 Difference----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------90/3.2 I'll let you sort it out because you need to pick the firearm that is best for you. And you can damn well conceal carry anything if you try. But the PPS was designed for conceal carry and is second to none in function, feel, and reliability. And it sits pretty flat on your back or at 4 o clock and you can fit it in a pocket if you so choose. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 15,784
|
I'd offer a third suggestion: The P99C AS.
![]() It's about the same size as the PPS, though a bit thicker, but it has a far superior trigger, IMO, which makes it much more accurate (for me, at least). It also has a greater magazine capacity. The decocker and a quality holster make it an ideal carry piece. I personally think that all three of these pistols are too large for pocket carry, but your mileage may vary. Good luck in whatever you choose.
__________________
Searcher 451 Μολὼν λαβέ |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Tulsa County
Posts: 180
|
I pocket carry my PPS in a modified DeSantis Nemesis holster in the right front pocket of my cargo shorts.
My PPS and PPQ have both functioned flawlessly, though I only have a few hundred rounds through the PPQ, probably 1500 in the PPS. That's the nice thing about the PPS, it's small enough there's no reason not to carry it.
__________________
Hater of DA/SA triggers. Lover of the trigger guard mag release. Carrier of one in the pipe. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 364
|
I carry a P99 every day, which is the same size as the PPQ. I've owned smaller guns, and in my opinion they aren't any easier to carry than a larger pistol like the P99. But, the P99 has a significant advantage in capacity and usability.
Of your choices, I'd take a PPQ |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 73
|
The PPQ is easy to conceal compared to other full/midsize handguns. I don't own a PPS but have held one a few times and I think it is a perfect blend of size and weight for a CC gun, meaning it's not to lightweight or small.
Quote: Originally Posted by searcher451 I'd offer a third suggestion: The P99C AS. +1 to the P99c, that might be the compromise in what you are looking for, bigger than the PPS and smaller than the PPQ. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 154
|
Thanks for the replies. I considered a P99C but it is so close to a PPQ in size. If the gun doesnt disappear on my belt then I might as well carry a PPQ and get all of its advantages.
BTW I just saw a review of teh PPS by NUTNFANCY who says the PPS is bigger than the G26. Is this correct?? I have a 26 and it carries easy but is a BRICK in my hand. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: flyover country - ohio
Posts: 1,956
|
Quote:
A PPS can conceal in a pocket, if the pocket is large and properly shaped and the PPS has the flush mag installed. I have really big pockets, and it is marginal for me. A wider gun would require baggier pants and larger pockets yet. Quote:
And the PPS was designed from the start to be a concealment gun, while the G26 is a shortened duty gun.
__________________
DON'T PANIC! DO, however, write your legislators. Really, write your legislators. Stop reading this, and get to work on that letter you keep putting off. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
Lower Navigation
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Search tags for this page |
nutnfancy walther pps,ppq vs pps,pps vs ppq,walther ppq concealed carry,walther ppq dimensions,walther ppq rebate,walther ppq reliability,walther ppq vs pps,walther pps dimensions,walther pps reliability,walther pps vs ppq,walther pps vs walther ppq |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|