![]() |
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 70
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Backwoods Virginia
Posts: 3,854
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11,443
![]() |
Thanks, MGMike. Lord only knows that one trophy wife would be enough. Just ask Tom Brady.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 225
![]() |
Quote:
Good one!!!
__________________
"A Grouchy German is a Sour Kraut!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 54
![]() |
While I'm trying to figure out how to get the photos off my cell phone and upload them to this thread, I thought I'd offer some visual differences I noticed between the two guns. My P5 has a glossy finish frame with a matte slide. His entire frame has a matte finish the same as my slide. Because of that the appearance of the weapon seems more refined and homogenous and the machine marks are not as pronounced. His hammer has a triangle stamped on the left side and mine does not. I already mentioned the different mag release catch on the lower grip. His has a later SN than mine. I suppose this begs the question, were there major, minor changes made to the P5 throughout the production run? If so, what were they? When did they happen. Anyone care to inform us.
Last edited by JPK; 02-06-2012 at 09:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11,443
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 54
![]() |
That will have to wait a bit until I can take some real photos with a good camera other than a cell phone one. He and I both have very good cameras so when we get together I will make it a point to document the differences between the two.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 54
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Lower Navigation
|
||||||
|
||||||
| Search tags for this page |
late congratulations to friend for |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|