WaltherForums  

Go Back   WaltherForums > Walther Firearms > P5

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2012, 07:17 PM   #1
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Backwoods Virginia
Posts: 3,854
MGMike .38
P5 vs. P5C

For those fascinated by data of mostly academic interest, I offer the following comparisons. These figures were not taken from a book, incidentally, but by actual measurement.

Mass:
P5, P5C
Slide assembly: 286.5 g., 267.7 g.
Barrel and locking block: 150.2 g., 141.3 g.
Total, recoiling parts: 436.7 g., 409 g.

(Difference of 27.7 g., or just under 1 oz. [28.35 g.] )

Barrel Length: 90mm, 79mm
(3.54"), (3.1")

Just what you always wanted to know...

M

Last edited by MGMike; 01-23-2012 at 09:01 PM.
MGMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012, 08:28 PM   #2
Supporting Member
 
jujonte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bowling Green, Kentucky
Posts: 643
jujonte .22
Quote:
Originally Posted by MGMike View Post
For those fascinated by data of mostly academic interest, I offer the following comparisons. These figures were not taken from a book, incidentally, but by actual measurement.

Mass:
P5 P5C
Slide assembly: 286.5 g. 267.7 g.
Barrel and locking block: 150.2 g. 141.3 g.
Total, recoiling parts: 436.7 g. 409 g.

(Difference of 27.7 g., or just under 1 oz. [28.35 g.] )

Barrel Length: 90mm 79mm
(3.54") (3.1")


Just what you always wanted to know...

M
Looks like you had a productive day Mike. Good information. Much appreciated. ~J
__________________
"Five to one baby, one in five,
no one here gets out alive" ~ Jim M.
-

NRA Endowment Member
Arizona State Rifle & Pistol Assoc.
jujonte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 09:16 AM   #3
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Backwoods Virginia
Posts: 3,854
MGMike .38
What these figures tell me is that, because the P5 and P5C use the same recoil springs, it is probable that the P5C has a higher slide velocity using any given cartridge. We know that the P5C works very well, so lightening the mass of the recoiling parts by one ounce compared to the P5 is still within the spectrum of what is acceptable for good functioning (though the P5C's power loss from its shorter barrel reduces somewhat the rearward momentum of the recoiling mass).

It might be interesting (I haven't done it) to weigh the same parts in the P38 and P4, and compare all of them. Since all use the same recoil springs, one could get a (very) rough idea of how much tolerance there is in this basic design for variation in mass.

I am not an engineer, but I am already wondering whether late P38s with the fat slide would have a greater tolerance for hot ammo than a P5.

M
MGMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2012, 11:26 AM   #4
Super Moderator
 
searcher451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11,443
searcher451 .22
Quote:
Originally Posted by MGMike View Post
I am already wondering whether late P38s with the fat slide would have a greater tolerance for hot ammo than a P5.

M
An interesting question, indeed. I'll keep fingers crossed for a rainy day in Virginia, which will keep you off the range and in the shop with the digital scale.
__________________
Searcher 451

Μολὼν λαβέ
http://www.amazon.com/Misery-Ridge-B...7278543&sr=1-8
searcher451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   WaltherForums > Walther Firearms > P5


Search tags for this page

p5 vs p5c

,

walther p5 vs p5c

,

walther p5c vs


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.