WaltherForums
 

Go Back   WaltherForums > General Interest > General Discussion

Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By olsoul
  • 3 Post By searcher451
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-28-2014, 10:09 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Jaems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,605
Jaems .22
The Dick Act of 1909

Sponsored Links
Can This be True ?



THE DICK ACT OF 1909 !! - This is legit and not a joke..

Wonder who in Washington is supposed to keep up with all the laws that have been passed (and ignored) throughout the years?



THE BILL was passed back in 1902 and grants full rights to anyone who wants to own as many guns as they can afford. Any movement to limit guns or magazines will be in direct violation of this law. Pass it around.


THE DICK ACT OF 1902! (BY CHARLES WILLIAM FREDERICK DICK)


ARE YOU AWARE OF THIS LAW?


DICK ACT OF 1902 - CAN'T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) - PROTECTION AGAINST TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT .


IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THE ADMINISTRATION IS COUNTING ON THE FACT THAT THE AMERICAN CITIZENS DON'T KNOW THIS, THEIR RIGHTS AND THE CONSTITUTION. DON'T PROVE THEM RIGHT.


THE DICK ACT OF 1902 ALSO KNOWN AS THE EFFICIENCY OF MILITIA BILL H.R. 11654 OF JUNE 28, 1902 and INVALIDATES ALL SO-CALLED GUN-CONTROL LAWS.


It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.


** SPREAD THIS TO EVERYONE **


The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia ;the unorganized militia; and the regular army.


The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.


The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.


The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.


The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union ; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.


Source...


Dick Act of 1902


Get this message out to all your email contacts.


It's time to learn about your rights.


(Thus making all California ( Colorado & others) gun & magazine limiting laws illegal !!!)


I'm not so sure the current administration KNOWS what the laws, Constitution, Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence say.


But it doesn't matter to them anyway. He and his minions certainly don't have any respect for them or us and will continue to do whatever they can get away with to further their cause of gaining complete control


Charles William Frederick Dick (November 3, 1858 - March 13, 1945) was a Republican politician from Ohio . He served in the United States House of Representatives and U.S. Senate.
I was curious as to who was the Dick in the .. DICK act of 1909 i found out little about him

DICK ACT of 1902 . . . CAN'T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) The Trump Card Enacted by the Congress Further Asserting the Second Amendment as Untouchable >> Four Winds 10 - Truth Windswww.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/us_constitution/gun_control/news.php?q=1237163642

but i found out a little more about the Dick Act
Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, "the Organized Militia (the National Guard) cannot be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States ."
The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.
During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada . The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country.
The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA , and not even beyond the borders of their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.
Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: "The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States ." In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, "that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it."
"This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose. Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power."
The Honorable William Gordon Congressional Record, House, Page 640 - 1917
Jaems is offline  
Old 02-28-2014, 10:32 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: S.E. PA
Posts: 196
Vulcan .22
I think it may have more to do with the National Guards for the states and the limitations for their deployments.
__________________
"My penny is as much my own as the King's ten pence is his: if the King may defend his ten pence, why not Selden his penny?"
Vulcan is offline  
Old 03-01-2014, 12:51 AM   #3
Supporting Member
 
UniversalExports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 5,336
UniversalExports .38
Rated almost totally false by Snopes: Dick Act of 1902
__________________
Universal Exports

The Globe is a ship that has everything—
Including a serial killer with a large knife
and a penchant for the rich and beautiful.

Visit me at my Blog and on Facebook
UniversalExports is offline  
Old 03-01-2014, 05:35 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
P99pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Between Seattle and Tacoma, WA
Posts: 968
P99pete .22
Besides, I am way over the age of 45, so they could point out it does not apply to me, even if it was true.
__________________
Homo homini lupus - Man is a wolf to man

Government, in all forms, is just controlled oppression. Just how bad it is depends on who is oppressed.
P99pete is offline  
Old 03-01-2014, 08:52 AM   #5
Supporting Member
 
olsoul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Florida "The Gunshine State"
Posts: 3,314
olsoul .22
I just got done reading the statute...it has no impact upon gun control as we normally consider it...the posters who have said above that this is false are correct.

But it is always fun to see stuff like this...falls in the category of: "how to legally never pay income tax again" or "the additive that gas companies don't want you to know about"
P99pete likes this.
__________________
A Mime is a terrible thing to waste
P.38 (ac 44), PPK/S, PPQ FE, P99c AS, PP (too many to count), PPQ Navy (classic), PPK
In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine-Erwin Rommel




olsoul is online now  
Old 03-01-2014, 09:13 AM   #6
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 3,603
imaoldfart .22
Quote:
Originally Posted by olsoul View Post
I just got done reading the statute...it has no impact upon gun control as we normally consider it...the posters who have said above that this is false are correct.

But it is always fun to see stuff like this...falls in the category of: "how to legally never pay income tax again" or "the additive that gas companies don't want you to know about"
Yes, and I'm still researching that 1,000 mpg carburetor. On a side note, I AM making progress on my perpetual motion machine.
__________________
He's not a Slow President, and he's not a Fast President....He's a Half Fast President
imaoldfart is online now  
Old 03-01-2014, 10:37 AM   #7
Super Moderator
 
searcher451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 20,538
searcher451 .22
Gun owners have plenty enough to worry about with real laws, real proposals, real initiatives, real efforts to curb the Second Amendment and fundamental freedoms.
__________________
Searcher 451

Μολὼν λαβέ
searcher451 is offline  
Closed Thread

Lower Navigation
Go Back   WaltherForums > General Interest > General Discussion

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.