Bandwidth - WaltherForums
WaltherForums
 

Go Back   WaltherForums > WaltherForums.com > Feedback, Comments and Issues

Like Tree11Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-17-2013, 12:27 PM   #1
Super Moderator
 
searcher451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 26,071
searcher451 .22
Bandwidth

UPDATE:

The QUOTES button was removed (11/24/16) so that new posts don't get lost under previous posts, which was so often the case on the forum. Posters can note by name who they are addressing or grab a line or two via a quick paste if they want to talk about a specific item in a previous post.

***

Update/in brief (11/15/16): Keep your mouse off the QUOTE button unless (and only unless) there's a good reason to quote a passage from a previous post. If you feel that you must quote from a previous post, please post only the relevant part of that post ... not the whole thing. Think of that button as the trigger on a pistol. Don't pull it unless you really want to shoot something.

Thanks.

If you see a notation in a post that it was edited for Bandwidth and have been wondering what's going on, please note item No. 6 in the forum's Rules of Engagement:

http://www.waltherforums.com/forum/f...ent-forum.html

Some judicious snipping of material from a previous post that you want to reference as you respond is appropriate. Quoting the entire passage takes up excessive amounts of bandwidth, and for no good reason. This is especially true when a photo or three are snagged, and quoted, with a comment at the end that says something along the lines of "Nice pix!"

Be sure that you leave the brackets alone at the start of the quote and at the end of the quote. To get the correct effect, you must leave them intact. it's the long stuff in the middle that has nothing to do with the point you want to address that needs to go ... again, for clarity's sake and as a help to fellow forum members.

Bottom line: If what you are quoting is miles longer than your reply, you need to snip snip snip.

Thanks in advance.
__________________
Searcher 451

Μολὼν λαβέ

Last edited by searcher451; 11-26-2016 at 08:20 PM.
searcher451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Register
Old 05-19-2013, 10:47 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 37
Bulld4wg .22
Quote:
Originally Posted by searcher451 View Post
If you see a notation in a post that it was edited for Bandwidth and have been wondering what's going on, please note item No. 6 in the forum's Rules of Engagement:

http://www.waltherforums.com/forum/f...ent-forum.html

Some judicious snipping of material from a previous post that you want to reference as you respond is appropriate. Quoting the entire passage takes up excessive amounts of bandwidth, and for no good reason. This is especially true when a photo or three are snagged, and quoted, with a comment at the end that says something along the lines of "Nice pix!"

Thanks in advance.
Sorry for the violation, I am a senior member of many forums and I have never seen this come up ever. Have ever thought about allowing loyal members to contribute? This may help overcome bandwidth issues.
Deputy and DefendLiberty like this.
Bulld4wg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2013, 10:51 PM   #3
Supporting Member
 
imaoldfart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 9,717
imaoldfart .22
http://www.waltherforums.com/forum/payments.php
DefendLiberty likes this.
__________________
45acp... turning human garbage into useful fertilizer since 1911
imaoldfart is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Old 05-20-2013, 07:55 AM   #4
Super Moderator
 
searcher451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 26,071
searcher451 .22
It's as much a courtesy to fellow members and the readers of threads than it is to the owners of the site who have to pay to keep the forum operating. Seeing the same series of photos show up three or four times in a row with a tagline at the bottom of each fresh post that says "Great pix! Thanks for sharing!!" is not a lot of fun to wade through, nor is it necessary to make the point.

Not that it matters, but you'll see similar requests in the rules for many forums. It's just that it's an oft-ignored one.
FrankenCub and DefendLiberty like this.
__________________
Searcher 451

Μολὼν λαβέ
searcher451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 11:48 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Deputy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Silver City, NM
Posts: 7,055
Deputy .38
Quote:
Originally Posted by imaoldfart View Post
I see nothing there that says if you pay you get to use more bandwidth.

I am a bit confused about this new procedure too. There are numerous forum sponsors paying to support this forum. And snipping off previous posts will make it pretty hard to follow the train of thought the poster is trying to address. I have already seen this confusion with posts I have had snipped. Sounds like the forum owners are trying to squeeze every last penny out of this forum. Even weirder is before the current forum owners took over, there was NEVER any problem with bandwidth.
Deputy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 11:54 PM   #6
Supporting Member
 
Milspec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6,722
Milspec .38
That's why you leave the relevant parts in. If the entire, earlier, long post is relevant type in "See Post #___". Let's continue this by PM please. Thanks...
.
__________________
Milspec

Last edited by Milspec; 04-08-2014 at 12:27 AM.
Milspec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2014, 06:50 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
bigfatdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: flyover country - ohio
Posts: 2,722
bigfatdave .38
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deputy View Post
snipping off previous posts will make it pretty hard to follow the train of thought the poster is trying to address
I think clarity can be maintained.
Easier to read, too.
__________________
DON'T PANIC!
bigfatdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2014, 09:31 AM   #8
Super Moderator
 
searcher451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 26,071
searcher451 .22
Nothing's new in this "new" policy, so-called. It was inherited by the current forum owners, and with good reason, I think. It's also standard on many other gun forums, some of which (and The High Road comes immediately to mind) have deleted the "quote" button because of excessive use, especially in reprinting photos with something approaching a two-word comment ("Great pix!") at the end.
__________________
Searcher 451

Μολὼν λαβέ
searcher451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2014, 04:32 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
GeoNole94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: G-Vegas & Bath, NC
Posts: 2,353
GeoNole94 .22
If more people who are regular users become a "supporting member" then perhaps we can all have more bandwidth?
__________________
"I don't need another 9mm pistol because I've already got a P5." Pilotsteve
GeoNole94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2014, 06:50 PM   #10
Super Moderator
 
searcher451's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Coast
Posts: 26,071
searcher451 .22
BFD is spot-on: It's easier on everyone if we snip the pertinent portion of a quote and then respond to that portion. It's pointless, and a waste of space, to quote a lengthy passage before adding "I agree" or "Couldn't have said it better myself" at the end.
__________________
Searcher 451

Μολὼν λαβέ
searcher451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   WaltherForums > WaltherForums.com > Feedback, Comments and Issues

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.